And a Little More..
One thing I don’t think I made clear about Correction: although the narrator and Roithamer attempt “little by little to comprehend,” the “why” of Roithamer’s suicide is never really in question. Unlike many books, which seek to make sense of a suicide, to find reasons, etc, Bernhard doesn’t make the suicide a mystery. Suicide is the final ‘correction,’ and thus doesn’t really need to be explained. It’s Roithamer’s life, particularly his childhood at Altensam, that is impossible to make sense of; a clear understanding is always just out of reach. For instance, Roithamer’s distaste for Altensam isn’t as easy as it seems:
Also, Stefanie noted below that she wasn’t sure whether or not I liked the book. So I’d like to clear that up:
YES!
He, Roithamer, had never had to get away from Altensam, he had, in fact, struggled all his life only to draw closer to Altensam, to make himself understood where it had always been impossible, a crazy dream, where it always would be impossible for him to be understood [....]This relationship to one’s home, to one’s childhood, resonated so strongly with me. The simultaneous repulsion and attraction, the inability to come to terms with it, to define it – I think this was more compelling for me than an explanation of Roithamer’s suicide would have been. In Correction, it is the period between birth and death that is the most infathomable.
Also, Stefanie noted below that she wasn’t sure whether or not I liked the book. So I’d like to clear that up:
YES!

5 Comments:
I thought you liked it but I wanted to make sure. I have added it to by wishlist :)
Correction is my favorite Bernhard book as well. (Steve M does not care anywhere near as much for it.) Hoeller's Garret owes so much to Wittgenstein's peculiar personals conceits that W's life is pretty enlightening for it. Ray Monk's W biography is excellent, and I'd recommend it.
Thank you for the tip! I know I missed out on a lot in Correction because of my lack of background in philosophy. I'm glad you pointed that out, because I have been looking for a way to approach Wittgenstein.
Caveat: the Monk bio isn't so great on the philosophy side of things, but I actually think that's not so important to appreciate Correction as being familiar with the sort of hyper-ascetic person that W was. He was an extreme, obsessive sort, which made him prime material for Bernhard, I suppose. I believe the "cone" is a reference to the house that W architected -very- carefully in Vienna.
As to approaching the philosophy, I still don't know of a good way. I took a class with the translator of the Tractatus, which got me up to speed, and I think that a lengthy, involved study with his work is almost required, unfortunately.
Hmmm...well, since I'm starting from scratch, the biography will at least give me some foundation, and I can go from there.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home